The ‘haze’ craze: Despite deaths, punishments, hazing occurs on college campuses with surprising regularity

By Aaliayah French

“Maryland high school football players accused of sexually assaulting teammates with broom.”

“Quinnipiac Men’s Lacrosse Team Suspended Pending Student Conduct Policy Investigation.”

“Penn State sophomore Timothy Piazza, 19, died after drinking large quantities of alcohol in his first night of pledging at Beta Theta Pi.”

With the hazing culture on a rise, headlines like these will likely be seen more often in the future. The right-of-passage into a group or club from the beginning of organized groups has sometimes been challenging. For obvious reasons, you must qualify to meet the standards of said organization or club, but sometimes your ability to be pushed to the edge is what gets you in.


Photo by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | Parents of Timothy Piazza discuss Beta Theta Pi hazing investigation at Press conference after their son’s death.

Photo by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | Parents of Timothy Piazza discuss Beta Theta Pi hazing investigation at Press conference after their son’s death.

For groups like fraternities, sororities and sports teams, hazing is a common and often, a determining factor in the recruitment process. Hazing can include rituals, extreme challenges, abuse or public humiliation. In recent years, hazing has been normalized by the entertainment industry in films such as “Neighbors,” “Dazed and Confused” and “Frat House,” as well as television shows that depict hazing rituals.  

“When you think that something dangerous is harmless, it can end up as a reckless activity where people are at a high risk of getting hurt, traumatized, and isolated,” said Jessica Chin, associate professor and associate chair of the Department of Kinesiology at San Jose State University. “This is especially true if, say, someone reports the activity, and the community rallies behind the hazers … so that the victims are the ones who are punished for reporting and the assaulters/hazers are protected from justice.”


Photo of Quinnipaic’s Alpha Delta Pi | Hannah Mayer’s Sorority Sisters.

Photo of Quinnipaic’s Alpha Delta Pi | Hannah Mayer’s Sorority Sisters.

Much like other universities, Quinnipiac’s student body comprises numerous Greek life organizations and top-performing athletic teams. What we don’t see behind closed doors are the incidences of hazing that take place among these social groups. Students often join Greek life because upon coming to college, they need  a place to fit in and identify with.

Unfortunately, the requirements to enter into some collegiate organizations involve gruesome rituals such as streaking, pranks, physical and emotional abuse, and humiliation. According to a CNN article, since 2005, there have been over 80 fraternity-hazing related deaths. Many of the hazing deaths are due to the abuse of alcohol and drugs. The article also stated that many of the deaths are a result of internal bleeding, car accidents and alcohol related injuries.

This reckless behavior, according to Chin, can be explained by students’ desire to fit in.

“Hazing culture is also dangerous because it could lead some people to do things that they ordinarily wouldn’t do just because they either want to be a part of a group, and they therefore feel compelled to participate, or they are uncomfortable or unsure of how to go against the group even when they are doing things that are ethically and morally questionable,” she said.

Hannah Mayer, a member of Kappa Alpha Theta, a popular Greek sorority on Quinnipiac’s campus shared her thoughts on the pressing dangers of hazing.

“Hazing culture can be dangerous not only physically, but also mentally to those who are affected by it,” she said. “Hazing culture can generate stereotypes for Greek life as a whole, and cause people outside this community to overlook the philanthropic acts of these groups.” .

Grieving parents of those who have passed in recent news have expressed their concern with Greek life because the culture of hazing is so prominent in college. They understood the severity of the challenges you might face in order to become a member. When examining hazing culture, understanding its origins is important. If we take a look at the history of hazing, it dates back to some thousands of years ago.

According to Walter M. Kimbrough’s “Black Greek 101: The Culture, Customs, and Challenges of Black Fraternities,” hazing culture and pennalism sprouted from as early as the 1700’s, known in other parts of the world as fagging. Fagging or pennalism was considered the system of torture and oppression designed to break first year students in. The practical jokes and abusive practices were often carried out by upperclassmen.

Omorogieva was all too familiar of the practice at his college.

“It is not uncommon to see juniors and seniors taking part in hazing,” said William Omorogieva, a Lafayette College alumna who was in a fraternity at his school. “I feel that they enjoy it most because they had to work and earn their status and to them, recruits need to go through the same things they did. To me, it makes the upperclassmen feel superior.”  


Quote from Oxy.com | Article entitled, “The Sordid and Dangerous History of Hazing.”

Quote from Oxy.com | Article entitled, “The Sordid and Dangerous History of Hazing.”

In the late 1600s, hazing replaced the word pennalism, after a Harvard student was expelled for conducting acts of torment on another students.

Though pennalism and hazing were gruesome, no one believed it would be taken to lengths where the outcome was death. This became a painful reality in the early 1900s, when hazing related deaths became a trend. The only way universities saw a solution being made was by forcing administration and faculty to personally crack down on hazing acts.

“I remember I had a professor named Dr. Kinkler,” Omorogieva said. “He used to walk around campus a lot and in class he’d always make it known that he was against hazing, whether it was sports teams or Greek groups. I think he tried to use the fear tactic to get people to stop but I think it wasn’t all that effective.”

There is an idea that if administration and faculty step in to inform students about the extremes of joining Greek life organizations, there would be less cases of hazing across the nation. Katherine Pezzella, director of campus life for fraternity & sorority life at Quinnipiac couldn’t agree more.

“Universities should make sure that students are educated about hazing,” Pezzella said. “We know that about 50 percent of freshmen entering colleges nationally have already experienced hazing and some of them are going to try to bring those experiences with them into their new college groups or teams. …Colleges should educate students on what hazing is, so students know what they can and cannot do.”

Hazing has told young men and women who wish to join these groups that in order to be a part of their group, they have to succumb to poor treatment and subject themselves to vile acts all in the name of “brotherhood” and “sisterhood.” This phenomenon is what makes Greek life so controversial.

“This [hazing] upsets me because it has been very contrary to my experience with Greek life,” Meyer said. “I am a member of an organization that helps shape women to be leaders and we don’t tolerate this type of behavior, as it is completely against our values.”  

Recently, the Men’s Lacrosse team at Quinnipiac were suspended for the fall season. After new players joined the team, existing players were caught taking part in hazing activities to initiate the new members. After an extensive investigation, the university decided to suspend the team for violating the student code of conduct. Quinnipiac has a strict conduct policy for student athletes and athletic directors. Once it was broken by the players, the university suspended the team for the year and handled the individual culprits involved in the matter. With 22 sections of the code being violated, with offenses ranging from theft, underaged drinking, abuse and harassment, the team will sit out of this season until further notice.


Headline of Hartford Courant Article | Quinnipiac Men’s Lacrosse Team Suspended.

Headline of Hartford Courant Article | Quinnipiac Men’s Lacrosse Team Suspended.

In light of the latest incident at Quinnipiac, as well as the nationwide incidents of hazing, combating these methods of initiation are is a top priority for administrators, especially at Quinnipiac University.

“We need to help students design activities that accomplish the same goals as hazing – such as team-building, overcoming adversity, bonding, etc. – that are not hazing and that are legal and productive for their group,” Pezzella said. “We also need to be serious about responding to hazing allegations when they crop up to enforce policy.”

Matthew Kurz, Assistant Dean of Student Affairs for Campus Life at Quinnipiac also shared his thoughts on how to rid universities and sports teams of hazing. “The education of students, faculty, and staff is critical to combat hazing or a culture of hazing… In addition, providing alternatives to hazing is another great way to combat it – showing groups that there are much better ways to build bonds and respect among members than hazing provides a different perspective and effective alternative which is often better than simply saying “don’t do that.”

The fight for student-run organizations and college teams to take better care of their members will continue to be pushed by higher ups in administration, but for now, parents, students and athletes must be aware of the silent dangers of organized groups and the hazing epidemic on the rise. “…make sure that hazing is appropriately addressed when it is reported and putting relevant policies in place to create a positive group or team is a start to awareness,” Chin said.  

A college basketball player’s perspective: My thoughts on racism, kneeling

By Aaron Robinson

Part 1

October 2018 — 50 years since U.S. sprinters John Carlos and Tommie Smith took a historic stand on the medal podium in Mexico City for the whole world to see.


Aaron Robinson

Aaron Robinson

At the 1968 Summer Olympics, after winning gold and bronze medals in the 200-meter race, Smith and Carlos called it a “Human Rights Salute,” advocating for equal rights and representation in society as their white counterparts.

The International Olympic Committee expelled Smith and Carlos from the rest of the games and banned them from the Olympic Village.

The irony of the situation is that Avery Brundage, the president of the IOC,  was also IOC president at the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin where many athletes gave a Nazi salute as they passed German chancellor Adolf Hitler throughout the Games.

No  suspensions.

No punishments.

Brundage said the salute was a national symbol at the time, that it was acceptable, but yet Carlos’ and Smith’s action was not.

Even knowing in 1968 that the salute supported the genocide of millions of Jewish people, Brundage determined that the fists of two black men merited suspension.

Fast forward to today’s climate in which Colin Kaepernick, a former starting quarterback who led his team all the way to the Super Bowl five years ago, is out of a job after kneeling during the national anthem before games.

Find out the hurdles athletes face when pursuing activism.

Why is he out of a job?

It has nothing to do with his talent as a quarterback that’s for sure. It is because he took a stand. It is because he decided to speak out against an issue that, for some, isn’t even an actual issue.

As a black athlete, I am here to tell you — racial inequality in American is a real issue.

In an interview with NFL.com in 2016, Kaepernick said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color. To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

But of course, rather than admitting that police brutality was the root of the issue and facing it and addressing it, many people changed the narrative.

They tried to make it about the flag. They tried to say that Kaepernick showed disrespect toward the flag and American armed forces for not standing for the anthem.


Colin Kaepernick takes a knee during the national anthem alongside his teammates during the 2016 NFL season. Kaepernick began his protest during the preseason in protest of police brutality and racial injustices against African Americans. (Flickr)

Colin Kaepernick takes a knee during the national anthem alongside his teammates during the 2016 NFL season. Kaepernick began his protest during the preseason in protest of police brutality and racial injustices against African Americans. (Flickr)

Kaepernick actually sat down with a member of the military before he began to kneel to discuss ways that he could protest without being disrespectful to those that fight for this country. The solution proposed by the soldier was to kneel. In the military, when a soldier dies or is injured during battle, members of the military keel to show respect to that individual.

From a sports perspective, whenever a player gets injured, everyone takes a knee while that player is down in order to show respect for that individual.

But the message became muddled.

In my opinion, the reason people are so upset is because Kaepernick — as a black athlete — took a stand against something that, quite frankly, the white NFL owners and the many white fans do not understand or experience.

They don’t care that cops get paid leave after killing unarmed black men over and over again.

They don’t care that the cops, if they go to trial, are often acquitted of charges for murder.

They don’t care that a black life is still not seen as equal to a white life in the eyes of many.

As long as nothing comes between them, their money and their entertainment on Sunday afternoons, they’re OK.

Plain and simply, they don’t want to hear from a football player. They want their ballplayers to be silent and content with the fact that he is a millionaire NFL quarterback.

ESPN The Magazine senior writer Howard Bryant said, “They don’t want to hear from us. They want us to be grateful. They want us to be quiet. If you’re not rich then you’re a drain on the society, if you are rich, then what are you complaining about they want you to be grateful. They don’t want to hear from you at all.”

“Us,” of course, being African Americans, “they” being white Americans.

This narrative of the white public wanting black athletes to be silent was never more evident than in February when Fox News’ Laura Ingraham got on the air and suggested that basketball stars Lebron James and Kevin Durant should “shut up and dribble.”

This came directly after a segment aired with James and Durant sitting in the backseat of a car with ESPN anchor Cari Champion, and the three discussed President Donald Trump’s racist remarks.

Rather than address Trump’s racist and divisive comments, Ingraham condemned the athletes for even mentioning it. She then insulted the athletes, joking about their lack of intelligence and poor grammar. She attempted to slight their credibility to speak on politics because they are athletes who, according to her, “get paid 100 million dollars to dribble a ball.”

The idea to “shut up and dribble,” though, is that — as Bryant, who recently published a book called “The Heritage: Black Athletes, a Divided America, and the Politics of Patriotism,” points out — it is ridiculous. Why? Because there has never been a time throughout our long history as a nation that black athletes have not been political.

“If you know your history, it was the white public and the white sports leagues that wanted black players to talk about politics in the first place,” Bryant said. “Who was asking Jesse Owens to get involved in politics against Hitler? It was the white media. Who was asking Jackie Robinson to get involved in politics? It was Branch Rickey and the Dodgers. It was white people asking black players to get involved.”


Jackie Robinson and Brooklyn Dodgers general manager Branch Rickey shake hands after agreeing to a contract back in 1948.

Jackie Robinson and Brooklyn Dodgers general manager Branch Rickey shake hands after agreeing to a contract back in 1948.

Bryant also went on to talk about other black athletes, such as Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan and O.J. Simpson, who have been criticized because of their lack of activism when it comes to politics and society.

Essentially, if you speak out, they’re mad at you. If you don’t speak out, they’re mad at you.

Bryant said, “They don’t want to hear from us at all. They want us to be silent and succumb to the oppression and the dehumanization of our people. They want us to be OK with our status in America and our lack of representation in society. They want us to accept the fact that there are black bodies in the streets and cops receiving paid leave only to eventually be acquitted of all charges.”

And that is exactly why we black athletes must speak.

We must use our voices to speak out and seek change because if we sit around and wait for the next person to make a change, we will be waiting for a cold day in hell.

Athletes have a voice and a platform that very few others have. It is absolutely essential that we, as black athletes, do not underestimate the power that we have.

We have the opportunity and the responsibility to be active members of our communities and to stand up for things that we believe in.


Members of the Miami Heat wear hoodies in support of Trayvon Martin after he was gunned down by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer.

Members of the Miami Heat wear hoodies in support of Trayvon Martin after he was gunned down by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer.

Part 2

I think the majority of African Americans agree that things in this country right now, from a race relations point of view, are far from ideal.

Millions of people support Kaepernick on his stance against police brutality. You hear the conversations among athletes. You see the tweets.  

Yet, the number of people who are sitting and watching in silence far outnumbers the amount of people who are actually taking a knee, or protesting — myself being one of them.

I am probably one of the most “woke” pro-black people you will find, but I haven’t taken a knee yet. And to be honest, unless something drastic changes, I don’t know if I will this season either.

Why not?

Because I am a Division I college basketball player and I have seen what has happened to professional athletes who have spoken out. I watched Colin Kaepernick get exiled from the NFL. I watched all-pro safety Eric Reid suffer the same fate until just a few weeks ago when he was finally signed after a two-year hiatus. Carlos and Smith served as an example. Muhammed Ali was stripped of his title because he spoke out against the Vietnam War and refused to serve.

The lesson is this: Black athletes who speak out against issues like this get destroyed.

If I were to speak out, who is to say that my scholarship will not be taken away? Who says that my coaches don’t take away my playing time? Who says I do not get expelled from school?

All of these fears are very real for black athletes and these fears are magnified for college athletes.

Professional athletes such as Kaepernick and Reid had the opportunity to make millions of dollars prior to them ever taking a knee. They were set for life regardless of what the outcome of their protest was.

I am a broke college student who comes from nothing, so I have literally everything to lose in this situation. If I lose this scholarship, I lose everything that I have ever fought for in my entire life.

Sigma Gamma Rho sorority inc. hosts 8th annual yard show at Quinnipiac

Students put on the 8th annual yard show in the Burt Kahn Gymnasium at Quinnipiac University on Friday Nov. 2. Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc hosted the event, which featured many different greek organizations from all around the greater New Haven area.

“A yard show is a competition where multicultural organizations come together to showcase different traditions of their respective organizations through strolls and steps,” Said Andrew Robinson, the president of the Zeta chapter of Alpha Phi Phi Fraternity Inc.

To see all of the fun that the night entailed, check out this video below.

Power outages frequent Quinnipiac residence halls this week

By Bill Ruocco

Late Monday night, residents at Quinnipiac University’s Mount Carmel campus experienced power outages that lasted into Tuesday afternoon.

Students first received an email at 11:27 p.m. on Monday with an update regarding the power outages.


As the severity escalated, students in both the Hill and Village resident halls were instructed to evacuate for the night in the event that the power was not returned to them by morning.


Today just before noon, students received an update on a possible solution.


At approximately 2:40 p.m on Tuesday students received another email that, in summation, stated that the problem was not yet dealt with.

 



Screen Shot 2018-03-20 at 3.10.01 PM.png

 

This story will be updated accordingly as more details emerge throughout the day.

Major sporting goods stores wade into gun debates


5810753486_4142bc5cb7_b.jpg

By Andrew Weiss

Several major sporting goods stores, headlined by Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmart, announced plans to limit gun sales at their locations. Dick’s announced its plans via social media on Wednesday morning, hitting Twitter and Facebook feeds with their new prerogative revolving around firearms.  

Walmart followed suit that night, adding onto its previous decisions regarding firearm sales.

The announcements come just weeks after the shooting in Parkland, Flordia left 17 dead. The shooter, Nikolas Cruz, used an AR-15 assault-style firearm, also known as a semi-automatic sporting rifle.

However, while the end of assault-style rifles occurs in Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmart stores across the country, in Connecticut it is the age restriction that hits hardest. The sale of assault-style weapons has been banned in Connecticut since the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012. The incident, when 20 children and 26 total people were killed, sparked cries for gun reform that were met with changes to magazine size sales, registration of certain firearms, and background checks for potential buyers.

The increase of age as a restriction is another step in the way for potential Connecticut gun owners. Emilio Zullo, a junior at Quinnipiac, works in the lodge section of Dick’s Sporting Goods. He sells anything from hunting and fishing goods to hiking and camping materials to, yes, firearms. As a gun owner himself, Zullo acknowledged the increase in steps it takes for a gun owner in Connecticut to purchase or own a firearm.

“In Connecticut specifically, there’s an ammo certificate, there’s a pistol and revolver license, and there’s a long gun license,” Zullo said. “You have to apply for different (types of registration) and they’re expensive. You have to take classes.”

According to Zullo, the hurdles associated with obtaining a gun in Connecticut are different in bordering states.

“When you have to pay over $100 just to get a license, it’s a bit ridiculous,” Zullo said. “In New York, I don’t have to pay to get a license, only a pistol permit. If I want to buy a rifle, I have to pay $150 to be certified (after classes) to buy a rifle.”

Zullo could not comment on the Dick’s ruling, stating only that employees were instructed not to speak on the issue.

Some Quinnipiac students were happy to see the change.

“I think it is a good step in the right direction. I am glad that private companies have decided to do what the federal government won’t,” Marc-Yves Regis, a Quinnipiac junior, said.

Owen Kingsley, a senior at Quinnipiac, agreed.

“I love the decision from Dick’s regarding assault rifles,” Kingsley said. “It’s not a huge factor by itself when it comes to the accessibility of assault rifles, but (it is) a possible decision that could trigger larger legislation in that area. I’m hoping it creates pressure on others to act.”

Dick’s stock has dropped since the Parkland shooting on Feb. 14, dropping 1.85 points to a total of 31.80 on Feb. 27 before the announcement. The stock has been growing since then, climbing more than .6 points back up.

Gun owners in Connecticut have been vocal on the decision. For more, Bill Ruocco delved into how gun enthusiasts are responding to these rulings.

Black Panther roars out of the box office

By Andrew Weiss

Like any good movie opening up to the public, “Black Panther” found itself in sold-out theater after sold out theater. During opening night on Thursday, it was more likely to find a four-leaf clover that wasn’t frozen solid than a ticket to a North Haven showing of “Black Panther.” Patrons lined the halls of the Cinemark on Universal Drive, a luxurious 14 screen theater, eagerly awaiting the first showings of the newest Marvel masterpiece.

Much like any great movie, however, the lines continued to find their way back. 

On Friday, showings of “Black Panther” sold out quickly throughout the day as reserved seats online and over the phone were snatched up by eager fans. The only way to walk into Cinemark North Haven and watch the new film was with a neck cramp, as the last available seats belonged to the front two rows.

Drive north a few miles to Wallingford, and you’d find the same dilemma at Holiday Stadium Cinemas, where showings sold out hours before the pre-film advertisements flickered on-screen. The sellouts continued all of the way until Sunday, where the 10 screen cinema updated their “Black Panther: sold out times” sheet by the entrance hourly.

“I would encourage everyone to watch it,” Ayanna Simpson said. “It has a beautiful message that doesn’t overpower the film but can be clearly seen, and I think it’s a breath of fresh air from today’s populated climate.”

Simpson serves as the program coordinator for multicultural education at Quinnipiac University. The African and Caribbean Student Union, along with the Student Programming Board and Department of Cultural Global Engagement at Quinnipiac, put together a “Black Panther” viewing event on Friday.

“Overall I thought it was a remarkable film,” Simpson added. “I loved how each character had a complete and complex story.”

Samantha Nardone, a junior public relations major at Quinnipiac, attended the viewing party with fellow Bobcats.

“It’s really important that they kind of defeated (the) stereotype that everyone in Africa is poor, because there are some wealthy countries in Africa and there are poorer areas,” Nardone said. 

“It’s important to show the pride people can have in black culture. So many movies and TV shows don’t show that at all (and) I think this movie helped to reduce that myth and stereotype. It was just awesome to see all the black power and black culture emphasized and the pride in that in this film.”

The nation’s box offices agreed with Nardone. 

Original projections expected “Black Panther” to claw in about $120million over the four-day opening weekend.

As Thursday turned to Friday, and Friday turned to Saturday, moviegoers shattered those projections. 

The three-day opening brought in an estimated $192 million, ranking fifth most all time. Current expectations project $218 million over the four-day holiday weekend in the United States with $361 million worldwide.

The film also broke the record for the largest opening by a movie with an African-American director. Ryan Coogler’s masterpiece destroyed the previous record of $98 million set by F. Gary Gray’s “The Fate of the Furious” back April 2017 of 2017.

Tiana Duggin of West Haven was happy to add to that total.

“This climate right now, because (of how) a lot of people in the world view what African Americans are, this can teach them what we were in the past, and what we can be in the future,” Duggin said.

The film is available for fans of the film, or anyone interested, in North Haven, New Haven and Wallingford.

Quinnipiac will host a roundtable discussion — A Place at the Table —on “Blackness, Heroism and the American Imagination: Can ‘Black Panther’ Expand the Marvel Universe?” The discussion takes place at 6:30 p.m., Tuesday in Buckman Theater. Professors in media studies, English and journalism will moderate. 

Contributions by Thamar Bailey

Looking at Connecticut’s gun reform after another school shooting

Photo: Members of the Navy participate in an active shooter exercise to prepare for incidents of gun violence. 

By Sal Siciliano

The shooting at a Parkland, Florida high school this Wednesday injured dozens and killed 20 people. 

While vital information remains unclear at this time, the incident has again brought increased attention to Florida’s gun laws. 

Less than two years ago, Orlando’s Pulse nightclub was the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history. The Oct. 1 shooting in Las Vegas, where 59 people were killed, has since eclipsed that total. 
     
In Florida, one can buy a gun without a license or registration. Potential buyers typically don’t need to go through a background check, including to purchase semi-automatic weapons. 

Opponents of gun control argue that gun restrictions have no direct effect on preventing violent behavior. However, Connecticut’s gun control policies in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012 has shown a decline in the state’s gun deaths.

“In 2013, Connecticut lawmakers made sweeping changes to the state’s gun laws. For starters, they broadened the scope of what the state classifies as assault weapons, banning more than 150 gun models,” said WNPR’s Lori Mack, who is also an adjunct instructor at Quinnipiac University. 

In Mack’s on-air story, she added, “The legislation also banned the sale of gun magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds. A permit is now required to buy any type of gun or ammunition. The state also has a registry of deadly weapon offenders and a universal background check system.”

According to data from the CT Against Gun Violence organization and confirmed by the state’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, gun homicides in Connecticut dropped from 115 in 2012 to 79 by 2015. 


gun gif.gif

Graphic by Andrew Weiss. Deaths classified as gun related homicides, per CAGV.

Despite new regulations, gun sales in Connecticut have not experienced any notable decline, but the state ensures that any gun owners and new firearm purchases are being more effectively monitored. 

This information is important to gun control opponents and legislators in states like Florida when seeking effective but publicly accepted firearm reforms. 
    
 

Quinnipiac no longer associated with Charlie Rose following sexual misconduct allegations

By Ariana Spinogatti and Beverly Wakiaga

Quinnipiac is rescinding its Fred Friendly First Amendment Award to former CBS anchor Charlie Rose. 

President John Lahey released the following statement after a cabinet meeting Monday morning. 

“Based on recent reports of inappropriate workplace behavior, clearly inconsistent with our institutional values, the university will no longer have Charlie Rose’s name associated with our university and our Fred Friendly First Amendment Award.”

This past November, The Washington Post published an article where eight women accused the anchor of sexual harassment while they worked with him.

Since then, Rose was fired from CBS and his program on PBS was canceled. On November 24, the University of Kansas and Arizona State University both rescinded the awards their journalism programs had honored Rose with.

Quinnipiac’s School of Communications has been honoring broadcast journalists with the Fred Friendly Award since 1994. According to Lee Kamlet, the former school of communications dean, the award is “intended to recognize outstanding achievement in broadcast.”

The dean of the school suggests candidates to Fred Friendly’s wife, Ruth Friendly. She then selects and approves the person in consultation with President Lahey.

“It was felt that he had the depth and breadth of the experience … that he had achieved excellence and was deserving of the award,”  explained Kamlet of the decision to honor Rose with the award in 2016.

While Rose has faced repercussions and issued an apology for his actions. Students at Quinnipiac have mixed feelings on whether or not he should be stripped of his award in light of these allegations.

“I know the award was given to him because of his journalism accomplishments, but I think that Quinnipiac’s honoring of this man will represent the school poorly and doesn’t accurately depict the school’s views on sexual harassment,” Molly Pelosi, a senior public relations major, said.  

Gea Mitas, a senior health science major, shares a different sentiment. 

“It was already given so why take it away?” asked Mitas. “When he was given this award, we knew what he had accomplished as a journalist and how successful he was in the industry. Those events in his career have not changed and that was the reason for getting the award in the first place.”

These are sentiments echoed by Ashley Kulik, a senior graphic design major.

“When the award was given it was meant for his work and not what he had on his personal time,”Kulik said. “Even though the allegations made against him are inappropriate, taking this back will not drastically change anything to make the situation better.”

This fall, a slew of notable men have been accused and admitted to sexual harassment claims in the workplace. Today show anchor Matt Lauer was fired from NBC due to similar allegations. Kamlet, a former ABC and NBC producer, defined this moment in time as a ‘Watershed’ moment.

“Women in all walks of life, not just journalism but entertainment and politics,” explained Kamlet, “women are finally saying enough and they are not going to put up with it anymore.”

Mohammad Elahee: Fulbright scholarship winner traveling abroad to Jordan

By Ariana Spinogatti 

Mohammad Elahee, a professor of international business at Quinnipiac, won a Fulbright to teach and complete several research projects while traveling abroad to Jordan in the upcoming spring semester. The J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board awarded Elahee this opportunity after his third time applying for the scholarship. 


Screen Shot 2017-12-07 at 2.41.25 PM.png

“I am going for teaching and research,” Elahee said. “Some Fulbright scholarships are for purely teaching or purely research. Mine is teaching some research. I will be teaching a graduate course on international marketing located in the capital of Jordan. I will also be teaching practical negotiation, which is my primary research area. I want to focus on the cultural aspects of negotiation. I plan on researching two studies, one about the role of emotional intelligence and the ethics in business negotiation. The second will be in the area of consumer behavior. My primary research project for which I got the scholarship was in the negotiation area.”

Elahee has a Ph.D. from the University of Texas Pan American, an MBA from the University of New Brunswick and a bachelor’s and master’s in accounting from the University of Dhaka in Bangladesh. Once Elahee became a U.S. citizen he was persuaded by a research partner of his to apply to Jordan. 

 “I really liked the country. It is a very stable country and there is so much history, so I wanted to go to a place where I could really enjoy being there. I will be teaching a graduate course. I will also be conducting research. I will also be doing some public lectures. Basically, Fulbright commission requires Fulbright scholars to act as sort of an official cultural ambassador of the country they are representing. I hope to meet as many people as possible and my family is also going with me so it will be a learning opportunity for my children.” 

The Fulbright Program is sponsored by the U.S. government in hopes to build strong relationships between the United States and other countries. To apply for the Fulbright, individuals must have strong academic and professional achievements, five recommendation letters and strong evidence of service in their fields.

“I was born and raised in Bangladesh and even before I came to the United States I was familiar with the Fulbright Scholarship,” he said. “It is a very prestigious scholarship and I know people from all over the world who come to the United States to participate in higher education and similarly American scholars go abroad to teach or do research. Even sometimes American students go abroad to study.”

Elahee is no stranger to Jordan. He has traveled their several times and thinks his teaching experience will greatly differ from his time at Quinnipiac. 

“In Jordan higher education is extremely complicated, it is competitive, they are very self driven, motivated, but there are not many resources. In the United States we have a lot of resources. In Jordan, students are very dedicated but they might not have the same level of foundation that American students have. Based on my limited experience, it seems to me that even though they do not have much sources, not much libraries, not good databases, the makeup for the resources is working extra hard.”

Elahee spoke with enthusiasm about returning to Quinnipiac and getting the chance to share what he learned with his students. He hopes his travels will help build a relationship between Quinnipiac and the University of Jordan. A goal of his is to bring Quinnipiac students on a study abroad trip to Jordan. 

“I know that it is unrealistic but if it was for a short amount of time for students to at least go there, learn about the Arab culture, learn about the Arab business practices, it would be worth it. There is a lucrative market there and Jordan is a very stable country. If our students have a better understanding of the Arab market, later, they can do business there. We live in a globalized world, we have to learn about other parts of the world and I find that in the United States we don’t have a good understanding of that. We know a lot about Europe because they are traditional trading partners but we do not know as much about Asia, Latin America, Africa or the Middle East. It’s time for us to tap into those markets and for that it is very important for our students to go visit, meet people and make friends, so I hope I can play a role in building that relationship.”

The CVS-Aetna Deal: What it could mean for the health care industry

By Erin Reilly

CVS Health’s plan to buy Aetna for $69 billion may reshape the health care industry.

CVS announced the deal on Sunday, claiming the merger would provide people with an “integrated, community-based health care experience.”

“With the analytics of Aetna and CVS Health’s human touch, we will create a health care platform built around individuals,” CVS CEO Larry Merlo said in a press release.


The deal could lead to changes for CVS stores across the country, including this one in North Haven. 

The deal could lead to changes for CVS stores across the country, including this one in North Haven. 

Aetna’s CEO and chairman, Mark Bertolini, added, “Together with CVS Health, we will better understand our members’ health goals, guide them through the health care system and help them achieve their best health,” Aetna’s CEO and chairman, Mark Bertolini, added in the press release. 

Most outsiders think the deal could come with both pros and cons.

“Effects from the merger may be positive or negative depending on the stakeholders’ perspective,” Jason Scozzafava, a clinical assistant professor of health sciences at Quinnipiac, said. “I believe what is highly likely is that a merger of this scope and scale will influence our health care delivery system.”

Specifically, Scozzafava said the merger could combine many health-related services in one company.

According to its press release, CVS has about 9,700 stores and 1,100 clinics, with 82 percent of Americans living within 10 miles of one of its locations. If CVS adds more locations, Scozzafava says it “would improve geographical access to health care services for many.”

“This strategy could also help to expedite the expansion of a new care delivery model, one which focuses on patient education, prevention, and management of chronic illness outside of the physician’s office,” Scozzafava said.

This will also affect the insurance side of the deal. Scozzafava said, potentially, it “could offer companies a ‘one-stop shopping’ experience for their employees.”

“People with Aetna insurance could have much of their preventative and disease management health care provided to them within the walls of the retail store,” Scozzafava said.

However, this may not be entirely positive. Scozzafava added that it “could also limit choices as to where one may go for care.”

He also noted that another possible negative effect of the deal could be the distancing between patients and their primary care providers. But Scozzafava feels there is still potential for various positive changes.

“Through the proper utilization of the CVS-Aetna health delivery model, the potential exists to help ease overcrowded emergency departments, improve patient ownership of their health, and decrease the cost of health care in the United States,” Scozzafava said. However, he noted that “a decrease in the cost of health care seems unlikely in our current climate, one that is dominated by private insurance companies.”

All of these possible scenarios rely on the deal actually going through. David Cadden, a Quinnipiac entrepreneurship and strategy professor emeritus, stressed that the merger still needs to be approved by the Department of Justice.

“Prior attempts to merge the largest insurance companies in the country were shot down by (the Department of Justice),” Cadden said.

However, Cadden said this case is different. He said the CVS-Aetna deal would be considered a vertical merger because the two companies are in the same supply chain. The deals that he says were denied were horizontal mergers because they consisted of companies from the same industry.

Cadden said CVS and Aetna “will argue that this merger will lead to significant cost savings, which then could be passed on to the consumer.”


For people with Aetna insurance, the deal may limit where they can fill prescriptions. 

For people with Aetna insurance, the deal may limit where they can fill prescriptions. 

“If they can demonstrate this, there is a significant probability that the Department of Justice would approve the merger,” Cadden said.

The question of whether or not the deal will be approved is part of a larger atmosphere of uncertainty within the health care industry, with its future remaining unclear.

“Our U.S. health care system is going through uncertain times,” Scozzafava said. “The political changes in Washington have led to uncertainty with Medicare funding and the (Affordable Care Act).”

Also, there is the threat of new competitors in the health care industry.

“Retail stores like CVS are responding to the threat of e-commerce, more specifically Amazon potentially entering the pharmaceutical distribution business,” Scozzafava said. “Amazon has proven its ability to disrupt longstanding shopping behaviors and CVS may be trying to get ahead of the change.”

The deal with CVS could be the second major Aetna-related change for Connecticut this year. In June, the insurance company announced that it would be moving its headquarters to New York City after being in Hartford for 164 years. Aetna plans to move sometime next year, but about 6,000 employees will remain in Connecticut.